ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Efficacy and safety of apalutamide, abiraterone acetate, and bicalutamide in the treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of three drugs-Apalutamide, Abiraterone, and Bicalutamide-combined with Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Methods: We retrospectively collected survival data of patients treated at our hospital from January 2019 to March 2024. Patients who received three different treatment regimens-Apalutamide (240 mg/day) combined with ADT, Abiraterone (1000 mg/day) plus Prednisone (5 mg/day) combined with ADT, and Bicalutamide (50 mg/day) combined with ADT. Results: This study analyzed 146 mHSPC patients. The results are displayed that Apalutamide and Abiraterone significantly prolonged PFS and PSA-PFS compared to Bicalutamide. Univariate and multivariate COX regression analyses suggested that factors such as age <75 years, absence of lymph node metastasis, use of Apalutamide or Abiraterone, and a low ECOG score were associated with longer PFS. Moreover, Apalutamide and Abiraterone showed superior efficacy in improving PSA response compared to Bicalutamide. Importantly, no life-threatening adverse events were reported in any of the three treatment groups. Conclusion: Compared to Bicalutamide, the novel endocrine therapies Apalutamide and Abiraterone both significantly prolong PFS, PSA-PFS, and improve PSA response rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.