ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Clinical efficacy, postoperative complication risks, and parental satisfaction in pediatric patients receiving tension-reducing suture treatment for facial lacerations.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy, postoperative complication risks, and parental satisfaction of tension-reducing sutures in pediatric patients with facial lacerations. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on 122 pediatric patients (aged 1-12 years) with facial lacerations who met predefined inclusion criteria (e.g., aged 1-12 years, wound length 1-5 cm, etc.; see Methods for details) and underwent surgical treatment at our hospital between January 2020 and August 2024. Based on the surgical technique received, the patients were divided into the tension-reducing suture group Results: The primary healing rate (Grade A) in the tension-reducing suture group was 88.5% (54/61), significantly higher than that in the conventional suture group (73.8%, 45/61), with a statistically significant difference ( Conclusion: Tension-reducing suture technique is more conducive to promoting primary wound healing and reducing scar formation in pediatric patients. Additionally, this suturing method was associated with a trend towards fewer complications while improving parental satisfaction with surgical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.