ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2025
Application of Remote Buried Dermal Super-Tension-Reducing Sutures for Incisional Scar Prevention.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Scar hyperplasia is a common problem after surgical incision healing, and incision tension is an important factor affecting scar formation. Although the traditional super-tension-reducing suture method can improve incision scars, there are problems such as exposure of the needle entry and exit points, which may cause adverse reactions such as pigmentation and scar hyperplasia. Methods: This prospective study proposes a new super-tension-reducing suture method-distal complete dermal undermining super-tension-reducing suture, which aims to reduce scar hyperplasia by reducing the needle entry and exit points on the incision. This method inserts the needle subcutaneously, undermines 1 cm in the dermis, and then withdraws the needle from the subcutaneous layer, which effectively avoids suture exposure and incision edge irritation. At the same time, by increasing the stress-bearing site, the maintenance time of the super-tension-reducing effect is prolonged. Results: This study was clinically applied to 50 patients with oral and maxillofacial surgery. The results showed that the observation group was superior to the control group in terms of scar score, pigmentation, centipede-foot scars and delayed incision healing, indicating that this new suture technique can effectively reduce scar hyperplasia and improve incision healing. Conclusion: This method provides a new technical option for surgical wound healing and has good clinical application prospects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.