ArticleBMJ oncology2025
Impact of loneliness on cancer mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in BMJ oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Loneliness is correlated with cancer mortality in US counties: an ecological analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- "It Feels Like They Cut off My Wings": Cervical Cancer Stories and Experiences Among Middle- to Older-Age Latina Survivors in the United States.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Patterns of Hope and Loneliness Among Patients and Caregivers Affected by Biliary Tract Cancers.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Longitudinal associations among loneliness and physical and psychological well-being in older cancer survivors.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Factors associated with serious psychological distress among US adult cancer survivors: a cross-sectional observational analysis of the 2024 National Health Interview Survey.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- The utility of psychometric network analysis for the study of social isolation, loneliness, and social support in persons with cancer: methodology and future directions.Frontiers in aging · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Loneliness and social isolation can have profound emotional and psychological impact on patients with cancer. Previous studies suggest loneliness may adversely impact cancer prognosis and survival. Potential mechanisms include a variety of biological, psychological and social factors, from impaired ability to access treatment to immune dysregulation. However, its impact is not clearly defined. We conducted the first systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate mortality in relation to loneliness and social isolation among cancer populations. Methods and analysis: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO until 13 September 2024, for studies reporting on the impact of loneliness or social isolation on all-cause and cancer mortality in patients with cancer. Three reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data and assessed bias. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to examine associations between loneliness/social isolation and all-cause and cancer mortality. Results: Of 12 602 citations, 16 studies met eligibility criteria and 13 were included in the meta-analysis. Social isolation and loneliness were most frequently measured using the Social Network Index and UCLA Loneliness Scale, respectively. The median sample size was 6248, with a mean participant age of 63 years. Meta-analysis demonstrated loneliness/social isolation was associated with increased all-cause mortality (HR (95% CI)=1.34 (1.26 to 1.42), p<0.001) and cancer-specific mortality (HR (95% CI)=1.11 (1.02 to 1.21), p=0.014). Conclusion: Loneliness and social isolation may be associated with increased all-cause and cancer-specific mortality in patients with cancer. If these findings are confirmed by future, more definitive studies, together they support the need to incorporate psychosocial assessments and targeted interventions into cancer care to improve patient outcomes. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024590482.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.