ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
A Comprehensive Evidence Summary for Pain Assessment and Management After Hemorrhoidal Surgery to Inform Clinical Practice Guidelines.
Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating Turkish society's approaches to hemorrhoid treatment using text mining and sentiment analysis methods.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Enhanced recovery pathways improve postoperative outcomes in haemorrhoid surgery: a narrative review.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Kangfuxin solution perianal warm moist compress combined with music therapy for anal fullness after endoscopic treatment of internal hemorrhoids.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate and summarize the best available evidence on pain assessment and management after hemorrhoidal surgery, thereby providing an evidence-based foundation for the future development of clinical practice guidelines. Methods: Literature was systematically retrieved using the "6S" evidence model, a hierarchical framework designed to prioritize the highest quality synthesized evidence. Searches were conducted across key databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library) from inception to February 1, 2025. Two independent reviewers performed screening, data extraction, and quality appraisal, with discrepancies resolved by consensus or a third reviewer. Results: A total of 22 studies were included, comprising 1 clinical decision, 3 guidelines, 7 expert consensuses, 3 evidence summaries, and 8 systematic reviews. These yielded 29 key evidence statements across seven domains: principles of pain management, pain assessment, pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), wound cleansing and dressing selection, and health education. Conclusion: This study consolidates 29 evidence-based recommendations from seven clinical domains essential for post-hemorrhoidectomy pain management. These findings directly inform clinical practice guidelines through the establishment of standardized frameworks for validated pain assessment tools, core pain management principles, multimodal analgesia protocols integrating both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, TCM therapeutic approaches, evidence-based wound cleansing and dressing selection standards, and structured health education programs, thereby enabling evidence-driven clinical standardization to improve outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.