ArticleBioactive materials2026
3D printed flexible composite scaffold with ultrasonic-driven wireless electrical stimulation promotes neuro-vascularization for critical-size bone defects regeneration.
Article in Bioactive materials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Static Scaffolds to Responsive Implants: 3D-Printed Field-Active Bioceramics for Adaptive Bone Regeneration.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Bone matrix-inspired whitlockite porous ceramic with effects of autophagy activation contributes to bone regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- CGRP-empowered stem cell sheet/short nanofiber spongeMaterials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Advances of piezoelectric biomaterials in bone defect repair: The role of direct and inverse piezoelectric effect.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Review
- Biomaterial-assisted gene therapy for bone repair.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Immunomodulatory Effects of Clinically Used Fat Emulsion to Promote Angiogenesis and Osteogenesis for Bone Repair.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regeneration of critical-size bone defects hinges on the reconstruction of neurovascular networks. The electrophysiological properties of native bone underscore the pivotal role of endogenous bioelectricity in coordinating nerve-vascular-bone regeneration. However, traditional piezoelectric scaffolds impede regenerative efficiency due to their intrinsic limitations. To tackle this, 3D printed flexible polyvinyl alcohol/whitlockite/barium titanate (PVA/WH/BaTiO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.