ArticleERJ open research2025
Oral contraceptives and the risk of asthma attacks: a population-based cohort study.
Article in ERJ open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hormone replacement therapy and the risk of asthma attacks: population-based cohort study.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Pregnancy, asthma and exacerbations: a population-based cohort.The European respiratory journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The role that sex hormones play in asthma remains unclear. The oral contraceptive pill (OCP), commonly used by younger women, acutely increases sex hormones providing an opportunity to observe their effect. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the association between OCP and asthma attacks. Methods: Using the UK's Clinical Practice Research Datalink, linked to hospital admission and mortality data, 2004 to 2020, we observed women with asthma (18-50 years), comparing OCP never-users to new-users; separated into a combined oral contraceptive (COC) cohort and progestogen-only pill (POP) cohort. We applied inverse-probability of treatment weighting and Cox proportional hazards, accounting for demographics, asthma severity/control and comorbidities. Additionally, we stratified by potential modifiers: age, body mass index (BMI), blood eosinophils (normal <0.3×10 Results: 132 676 and 129 151 women were eligible for the COC and POP cohorts, respectively. There was no association between COC, or POP, and asthma attacks (COC: weighted-HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.89-1.13; POP 1.11, 95% CI 0.97-1.28). However, POP association was modified by asthma phenotype and corticosteroid use, but not BMI, after accounting for asthma severity/control, demographics and comorbidities. In the POP users, women who were younger than 35 years (weighted-HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.12-1.72), those with eosinophilia (weighted-HR 1.24, 95% CI 0.97-1.58) or those with lower corticosteroid use (weighted-HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.03-1.40) had an elevated risk of asthma attacks. Conclusions: Commencing exogenous progesterone without an oestrogen component (POP) was associated with increased asthma attacks in asthma phenotypes including in younger women, eosinophilic asthma and women with lower corticosteroid use.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.