ArticleBioinformatics advances2025
Synthetic data-driven AI approach for fetal chromosomal aneuploidies detection.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: A major limitation in the development of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy detection technologies lies in the scarcity of real positive data. To address this issue, we propose a novel methodology to generate virtually unlimited synthetic negative and positive datasets with >99.9% similarity to real data, enabling accurate detection of both autosomal chromosome aneuploidies (ACA) and sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCA). In terms of methods, blood samples from 15 999 pregnant women were analyzed, including 186 clinically confirmed positive cases. Using 701 high-confidence negatives as a reference, we designed algorithms for synthetic data generation. For negatives, multiple real FASTQ files were randomly merged, and fetal fraction (FF) was recalculated to reflect biological variability. For positives, chromosome-specific read counts were adjusted using numerical equations: ACAs were simulated by increasing the target chromosome reads, and SCAs were generated by adjusting sex chromosome read counts using regression models that account for FF and total read count, with the GC distribution preserved. Logistic regression (LR) models were then trained using features including FF, GC content, and chromosomal read counts. Performance was evaluated against conventional Results: From high-confidence negative samples, ∼160 000 synthetic training datasets were generated for major ACA and ∼35 000 for each SCA. While Availability and implementation: All formulas and procedures required for synthetic data generation and model development are implemented in Python and are available at https://github.com/genomecare-rnd/SyntheticData-NIPT.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.