Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41158427›Full record

ReviewMaternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)2025

First Trimester Ultrasound Soft Markers in a Fetus: Genetic Associations and Diagnostic Implications.

Mishu Mangla, Naina Kumar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Clinical utility of chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with ultrasound soft markers: A retrospective single-center comparative study with karyotyping.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mishu ManglaDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bibinagar, Hyderabad, Telangana 500088, India.
Naina KumarDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bibinagar, Hyderabad, Telangana 500088, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in prenatal screening have significantly improved the early detection of fetal anomalies and chromosomal abnormalities. Among these, first-trimester soft markers have emerged as valuable indicators of potential adverse outcomes. This review explores the clinical relevance of key markers-including increased nuchal translucency (NT), nasal bone hypoplasia, tricuspid regurgitation, aberrant right subclavian artery, and abnormal ductus venosus flow-and their associations with aneuploidy, structural malformations, and pregnancy complications such as preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction. We emphasize the importance of interpreting soft markers within a comprehensive clinical context, rather than in isolation, and examine their underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and associated statistical risks. Particular attention is given to the integration of soft marker findings with advanced screening techniques, including cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing and maternal serum biochemistry, to improve diagnostic accuracy. In addition, we review current recommendations for clinical management, such as the use of follow-up diagnostic procedures like chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis, and the role of multidisciplinary counselling in high-risk pregnancies. Future research should aim to validate novel soft markers and promote the standardization of screening protocols to enhance maternal and fetal outcomes.

Indexed as

First trimesterFirst trimester anomaly scanGenetic ultrasoundNT NB ScanSoft markers

Identifiers

PMID41158427
PMCPMC12558219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.