ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Machine learning-based model for predicting distant lymph node metastasis in esophageal cancer.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and validation of prediction model for intrapulmonary metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma based on machine learning.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Distant lymph node metastasis (LNM) from esophageal cancer is relatively difficult to detect and is associated with a poor prognosis. Our study aimed to develop machine learning models for predicting distant LNM in esophageal cancer, with the goal of enhancing diagnostic accuracy, optimizing treatment strategies, and identifying high-risk patients for personalized clinical management. Methods: The demographic and clinicopathological data of patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, 17 Registries, November 2023 (2000-2021). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were applied to select correlation variances related to distant LNM. Seven machine learning models were constructed, including random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), gradient boosting (GB), Naïve Bayes, artificial neural network (ANN), and adaptive boosting (ADB) models. The predictive performance of the models was evaluated in terms of accuracy, F1 score, recall rate, and area under the curve (AUC). Importance rank and Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) were performed to explain the machine learning models. We validated the machine learning model in 53 patients with esophageal cancer at our clinical center, Beijing Friendship Hospital. Results: Among the machine learning models, the GB model outperformed the other models, with an accuracy of 0.929, a recall of 0.427, an F1 score of 0.414, and an AUC of 0.912. The interpretable module revealed that tumor (T) stage, node (N) stage, age, liver metastasis, and lung metastasis were significant predictors. T stage was the most significant predictor of distant LNM in patients with esophageal cancer. The validation dataset revealed a high accuracy of 0.818, a recall of 0.857, and an AUC of 0.857. Conclusions: The GB model emerged as the best model for predicting LNM in the esophageal cancer model. The importance rankings provide a degree of explanation, and the model can assist physicians in the initial prediction of LNM, providing a clinical reference and guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.