ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Comparison of surgery and stereotactic body radiation therapy for clinical stage I NSCLC: a propensity score-matched analysis from a single institution.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lobectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection is the standard treatment for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). For medically inoperable patients or those unwilling to undergo surgery, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as an alternative. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of SBRT and surgery in patients with stage I NSCLC treated at a single institution. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with clinical stage I NSCLC at Ajou University Hospital from 2016 to 2021. Patients who had prior malignancies or double primary lung cancers were excluded. A total of 214 patients were included, and propensity score matching (PSM) (1:3) was applied to adjust for confounding variables, resulting in 31 patients in the SBRT group and 93 in the surgery group. Clinical outcomes were compared, including overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and recurrence patterns. Results: After matching, the 3-year OS was similar between the SBRT and surgery groups (90.0% Conclusions: In clinical stage I NSCLC, SBRT showed comparable OS and distant recurrence outcomes to surgery, although it was associated with a higher local recurrence rate. For elderly patients or those with high surgical risk, SBRT may be considered an effective alternative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.