ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
The effect of different work rate increasing rates on cardiopulmonary exercise testing in arm ergometer.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cycle ergometer is commonly used for cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), which is the objective and quantitative golden standard for functional evaluation and training, while arm CPET is less commonly used to clinically assess a patient's overall functioning. To determine optimal CPET protocols, we studied the effect of different work rate increasing rates of arm ergometer on CPET key variables. Methods: We recruited fourteen non-symptomatic participants without any clinical diagnosis, and first performed maximal leg CPET for functional evaluation, followed by four maximal arm ergometer CPETs using different work rate increasing rates (5, 20, 35, and 50 W/min) in random order on various days in one week (7 days). The key variables are oxygen uptake ( Results: All participants safely finished maximal CPET using leg and arm ergometers, and they had normal leg CPET peak Conclusions: The study indicates that same as leg ergometer CPET, the arm ergometer CPET also needs optimized increasing rate of incremental exercise for each subject. We preliminarily recommend a work rate increasing rate of about 10-20 W/min in arm ergometer CPET for healthy individuals, which needs further investigation for functional evaluation and training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.