Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41158389›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025

Comparison of the difference between post-intubation tracheal stenosis and post-tracheostomy tracheal stenosis: a cross-sectional study.

Xiao-Feng Liu, Fu-Yao Nan, Lei Li, Jun Teng, Heng Zou, Hong-Wu Wang, Nan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiao-Feng Liu *Department of Respiratory Medicine, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Fu-Yao Nan *Department of Respiratory Medicine, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Lei Li *Respiratory Disease Center, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2602-5949
Jun TengDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Heng ZouRespiratory Disease Center, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Hong-Wu WangRespiratory Disease Center, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6401-977X
Nan ZhangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine II, Beijing Emergency General Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: With the rapid development of critical care medicine, tracheal intubation and tracheotomy are increasingly used. Meanwhile, the number of tracheal stenosis cases, as one of the complications, is gradually rising. Bronchoscopic interventional treatment is quite effective for tracheal stenosis. However, the differences in treatment effects between post-intubation tracheal stenosis (PITS) and post-tracheostomy tracheal stenosis (PTTS) remain unclear. Also, there is a lack of in-depth and systematic exploration on the distinctions between these two types of tracheal stenosis with different causes. Thus, this article will describe and compare PITS and PTTS in detail, explore their differences and differences in treatment effects, aiming to provide a basis and guidance with certain reference value for clinical medical practice. Methods: In this cross-sectional observational study, the data of PITS and PTTS patients undergoing bronchoscopic interventional therapy in the Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine II, and Oncology Department of Emergency General Hospital and the Department of Respiratory Medicine in Dongzhimen Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine were retrospectively analyzed. Results: The PTTS group had a higher prevalence of neurological diseases and burns, with more common dynamic stenosis; the PITS group was more commonly associated with drug poisoning respiratory, digestive, and circulatory system diseases, with scar tissue being more prevalent (P<0.05). Stenosis length was significantly longer in the PTTS than in the PITS. In terms of treatment modalities balloon dilatation and scleroscopic laser were more frequently used in the PITS group than in the PTTS group (P<0.05). After treatment, both groups showed significant reductions in the degree of stenosis and modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scores, with a significant increase in Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) scores (P<0.05), and a significant improvement in the degree of endoscopic stenosis (P<0.05). The PTTS group had fewer average hospitalizations and longer intervals between the two hospitalizations (P<0.05). Conclusions: The clinical characteristics of the two patient groups are different. Bronchoscopic intervention showed significant efficacy on PITS and PTTS, with a more pronounced improvement in KPS scores in PTTS patients.

Indexed as

bronchoscopic interventionmechanical ventilationtracheal intubationtracheal stenosisTracheostomy

Identifiers

PMID41158389
PMCPMC12557613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.