ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2025
Precise localization techniques for small pulmonary nodules: what is next?
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intraoperative Molecular Imaging in Thoracic Oncology: Expanding the Observable Disease Space.Cancers · 2026Review
- CT-guided indocyanine green fluorescence localization demonstrates superior reliability over hook-wire for pulmonary ground-glass nodules: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Editorial: Liquid biopsy in non-small cell lung cancer for diagnosis, treatment selection and monitoring.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the widespread adoption of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening, the detection rate of small pulmonary nodules has surged, necessitating precise localization for minimally invasive resection. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), being the gold standard for diagnosis and treatment, faces significant challenges in localizing nodules <1 or >1.5 cm from the pleural surface, particularly ground-glass nodules, due to limited tactile feedback. This review systematically evaluates advancements in preoperative and intraoperative localization techniques, focusing on four domains: computed tomography (CT)-guided methods (e.g., liquid agents like indocyanine green, metallic markers, and robotic-assisted puncture), bronchoscopy-guided approaches [electromagnetic navigation, radial endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS), and robotic bronchoscopy], three-dimensional (3D) printing navigation, and emerging technologies (augmented reality and real-time noninvasive systems). Despite progress, limitations persist: CT-guided methods face complications like pneumothorax (20%) and operator dependency, while bronchoscopic techniques exhibit lower diagnostic yields (18-60%
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.