ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Survival prediction model for hypoxemic patients receiving post-extubation oxygen therapy after invasive ventilation: based on the MIMIC database.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hypoxemia is a common symptom in critically ill patients, with over half of patients in intensive care unit (ICU) experiencing varying degrees of hypoxemia, and its severity is an independent risk factor for patient mortality. Invasive mechanical ventilation is the main treatment for hypoxemia, but prolonged mechanical ventilation may lead to complications such as alveolar damage and accumulation of inflammatory factors. Therefore, clinical consensus emphasizes early extubation to reduce risk. However, some patients are prone to respiratory failure or re-intubation failure after extubation, resulting in a poor prognosis. Oxygen therapy, as a commonly used supportive measure after extubation, can improve oxygenation. However, there is currently limited research on the survival of patients with hypoxemia who receive post-extubation oxygen therapy after invasive ventilation, and there is a lack of effective prognostic tools. This study aimed to develop and validate a predictive model that integrates clinical features and laboratory indicators to identify the survival risk of hypoxemic patients receiving post-extubation oxygen therapy after mechanical ventilation, providing a basis for clinical treatment decisions. Methods: A total of 7,340 patients from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV) database were randomly assigned to a training set and a validation set in an 8:2 ratio. Logistic regression, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models were introduced to establish prediction models. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) tool was applied for visualization. The performance of the models was evaluated by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC of ROC) curves as well as the decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: The predictive factors incorporated in the nomogram included minimum blood urea nitrogen (BUN), maximum partial pressure of oxygen (pO Conclusions: The nomogram constructed in this study can accurately predict the risk and prognostic factors of hypoxemic patients who undergo invasive ventilation and receive oxygen therapy after extubation, which will aid in guiding clinical treatment in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.