Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41158365›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2025

Narrative review of malignant central airway obstruction: management updates.

Sung Choi, Udit Chaddha

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sung ChoiDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3853-4799
Udit ChaddhaDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Malignant central airway obstruction (MCAO) is a life-threatening condition that results from the narrowing of major airways due to malignancies. MCAO may result from intrinsic, extrinsic, or mixed morphologies of obstruction, which along with patient-specific factors determine treatment pathways. This review provides an updated overview of the management of MCAO, highlighting both traditional and emerging therapeutic modalities. Through a nuanced understanding of these therapies, proceduralists can optimize MCAO management and improve patient outcome. For intrinsic or mixed MCAO, bronchoscopic ablative therapies with immediate effects-including laser, electrocautery (EC), argon plasma coagulation (APC), and cryo-debulking-are essential for restoring airway patency and symptom relief. Delayed-effect modalities, such as photodynamic therapy (PDT), endobronchial brachytherapy (EBBT), and cryotherapy via sequential freeze-thaw cycles, serve as alternative strategies when immediate recanalization is unnecessary or poses risks. Airway stenting remains the gold standard for re-establishing patency in cases of extrinsic or predominantly extrinsic mixed MCAO. This review discusses these ablative modalities and novel technologies, such as microwave ablation (MWA), as well as advancements in stenting techniques like three-dimensional (3D)-printed and biodegradable stents (BDS), offering promising options for MCAO treatment. Methods: We conducted a narrative review based on literature identified through PubMed and Google Scholar searches, manual review of references from relevant articles, and expert consultations. Personal clinical experience also informed the interpretation and contextualization of the data. Key Content and Findings: Despite the range of available treatments, the choice of modality is primarily influenced by proceduralist expertise, resource availability, and patient and tumor characteristics. Direct comparisons between treatment modalities are currently lacking, and the diverse clinical contexts present challenges to standardized evaluations in future studies. This review does not address curative-intent endobronchial management of carcinoid tumors. Conclusions: A thorough understanding of each modality's principles, advantages, and limitations enable proceduralists to optimize treatment strategies for MCAO. Multimodal approaches tailored to patient needs and tumor characteristics are often required. Future research should prioritize patient-centered outcomes and clarify optimal stenting practices, surveillance strategies, and integration with systemic therapy.

Indexed as

ablationMalignant central airway obstruction (MCAO)stent

Identifiers

PMID41158365
PMCPMC12557659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.