ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Patient Preferences in empYema treatment (PAPY-study): are we investigating relevant outcomes for patients?
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parapneumonic pleural infection is a common clinical issue and limited data are available regarding patients' treatment preferences and the extent to which these preferences influence treatment decision-making. This study aimed to identify outcome measures that are most relevant for patients who underwent treatment for parapneumonic pleural infection. Data were collected through a questionnaire on treatment experiences and preferences, complemented by a structured interview. Between 2021 and 2023, patients treated at a single tertiary referral center were identified. Eligible patients had undergone either chest tube drainage (with or without intrapleural enzymatic therapy, IET) or surgery (open thoracotomy or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, VATS). A total of twelve patients met the inclusion criteria. Four were treated with a chest tube (with or without IET), and eight underwent surgical intervention, including those who initially received drainage but subsequently required surgery. Despite the small sample size, several consistent themes emerged. Pain and immobilization were identified as key patient-reported outcome measures of hospitalization and treatment. Furthermore, minimizing the risk of complications and reducing the duration of antibiotic treatment were identified as key treatment priorities. Following treatment, full recovery, returning to work, and performing daily activities were crucial outcomes for patients. This study identifies the patient-reported outcome measures most important to patients and highlights the need to incorporate them into future clinical research on parapneumonic pleural infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.