Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41158286›Full record

ReviewMedical review (2021)2025

Artificial intelligence-driven transformative applications in disease diagnosis technology.

Junyu Zhou, Sunmin Park, Sihan Dong, Xiaoying Tang, Xunbin Wei

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical review (2021), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Junyu ZhouInstitute of Advanced Clinical Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5931-1477
Sunmin ParkDepartment of Bioconvergence, Hoseo University, Asan, South Korea.
Sihan DongInstitute of Advanced Clinical Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Xiaoying TangDepartment of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Xunbin WeiInstitute of Advanced Clinical Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in medical diagnostics represents a transformative advancement in healthcare, with projected market growth reaching $188 billion by 2030. This comprehensive review examines the latest developments in AI-driven diagnostic technologies across multiple disease domains, particularly focusing on cancer, Alzheimer's disease (AD), and diabetes. Through systematic bibliometric analysis using GraphRAG methodology, we analyzed research publications from 2022 to 2024, revealing the distribution and impact of AI applications across various medical fields. In cancer diagnostics, AI systems have achieved breakthrough performances in analyzing medical imaging and molecular data, with notable advances in early detection capabilities across 19 different cancer types. For AD diagnosis, AI-powered tools have demonstrated up to 90 % accuracy in risk detection through non-invasive methods, including speech pattern analysis and blood-based biomarkers. In diabetes care, AI-integrated systems incorporating deep neural networks and electronic nose technology have shown remarkable accuracy in predicting disease onset before clinical manifestation. These developments collectively indicate a paradigm shift toward more precise, efficient, and accessible diagnostic approaches. However, challenges remain in standardization, data quality, and clinical implementation. This review synthesizes current progress while highlighting the potential for AI to revolutionize medical diagnostics through enhanced accuracy, early detection, and personalized patient care.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningdisease diagnosiselectronic health recordsmedical imaging

Identifiers

PMID41158286
PMCPMC12558038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.