ArticleTranslational cancer research2025
Demystifying programmed cell death in lung adenocarcinoma: combined prognostic model construction.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identification and validation of parthanatos-related genes in lung adenocarcinoma and construction of a prognostic risk model.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) presents significant treatment challenges due to late-stage diagnosis and limited therapeutic options. The prognostic value of programmed cell death (PCD) gene signatures in LUAD remains inadequately investigated. This study aims to develop and validate prognostic models based on PCD-related genes, particularly necroptosis and pyroptosis, to improve risk stratification and identify potential therapeutic targets for LUAD patients. Methods: Multiple prognostic models and a combined prognostic model (CPM) for LUAD were developed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, based on 12 PCD-related prognostic genes. Model performance was assessed using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Multivariate Cox regression identified key genes and led to the construction of a new CPM. Validation was performed using The Cancer Genome Atlas and Gene Expression Omnibus datasets, as well as machine learning techniques. Immune infiltration and single-cell RNA sequencing analyses were employed to correlate gene expression with immune responses. Results: The LASSO models for necroptosis [area under the curve (AUC) =0.717] and pyroptosis (AUC =0.713) demonstrated strong predictive performance, while the CPM model (AUC =0.735) successfully identified high-risk patients with LUAD experiencing poorer overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) =3.05, P<0.001]. Multivariate Cox regression identified 13 key genes, including those involved in necroptosis and pyroptosis, which were used to develop the new CPM. Validation across eight Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets confirmed the robustness of the model (average HR =2.52, P<0.001). Machine learning analyses identified Conclusions: This study highlights the prognostic relevance of PCD in LUAD, particularly the combined roles of necroptosis and pyroptosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.