ArticleTranslational cancer research2025
Efficacy and safety of antibody-drug conjugates in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of antibody-drug conjugates in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer after tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Evolution and recent advances in antibody-drug conjugate therapy for lung cancer: a comprehensive systematic review based on the Trialtrove database (inception to July 1, 2025).Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- The Construction and Preclinical Evaluation of Antitumor Activity of a Novel MIgG-OXA ADC in Lung Adenocarcinoma.Oncology research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) constitute an emerging class of targeted agents designed to deliver cytotoxic payloads selectively to tumor cells, thereby minimizing systemic toxicity. In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), several ADC targets have demonstrated antitumor activity in early-phase clinical trials, particularly in the advanced/metastatic setting following progression on standard therapies. Nevertheless, the current evidence remains fragmented due to small sample sizes, single-arm study designs, and heterogeneous patient populations, which limits robust conclusions regarding their comparative efficacy and safety profiles. This study aimed to systematically evaluate and conduct a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of ADCs for the treatment of advanced or metastatic NSCLC by analysing data from prospective clinical trials. These findings provide strong evidence supporting personalised clinical treatment strategies. Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and conference proceedings for prospective trials published until 30 January 2025. Two researchers (X.J. and W.Z.) independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment and Methodological index for non-randomised studies tool. Statistical analyses were performed with R 4.4.2 using a random-effects model, including heterogeneity (I Results: Thirteen prospective clinical studies were included, comprising five randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and eight single-arm cohort studies, involving 1,681 patients. The pooled overall response rate (ORR) was 0.30 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.23-0.36; I Conclusions: Our analysis revealed that although ADCs demonstrate promising efficacy in advanced/metastatic NSCLC, the interpretability of these findings is constrained by significant interstudy heterogeneity. Current evidence lacks a clear superiority of ADCs monotherapy over standard chemotherapy. Future large-scale randomised trials should optimise the clinical use through combination approaches, subgroup efficacy analyses, and long-term safety assessments. Such studies are crucial to guide evidence-based strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.