Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41158249›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2025

Efficacy and safety of antibody-drug conjugates in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials.

Xiaoni Jin, Weixing Zhao, Bo Li, Yujia Gu, Zirui Li, Wanjing Guo, Xinxin Lu, Jun Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiaoni Jin *Department of Oncology, Graduate School of Qinghai University, Qinghai, China.
Weixing Zhao *Department of Oncology, Graduate School of Qinghai University, Qinghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1291-4788
Bo LiDepartment of Oncology, Graduate School of Qinghai University, Qinghai, China.
Yujia GuDepartment of Oncology, Graduate School of Qinghai University, Qinghai, China.
Zirui LiDepartment of Oncology, Graduate School of Qinghai University, Qinghai, China.
Wanjing GuoDepartment of Oncology, Graduate School of Qinghai University, Qinghai, China.
Xinxin LuDepartment of Oncology, Graduate School of Qinghai University, Qinghai, China.
Jun JiangDivision III, Department of Medical Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Qinghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6248-6179

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) constitute an emerging class of targeted agents designed to deliver cytotoxic payloads selectively to tumor cells, thereby minimizing systemic toxicity. In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), several ADC targets have demonstrated antitumor activity in early-phase clinical trials, particularly in the advanced/metastatic setting following progression on standard therapies. Nevertheless, the current evidence remains fragmented due to small sample sizes, single-arm study designs, and heterogeneous patient populations, which limits robust conclusions regarding their comparative efficacy and safety profiles. This study aimed to systematically evaluate and conduct a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of ADCs for the treatment of advanced or metastatic NSCLC by analysing data from prospective clinical trials. These findings provide strong evidence supporting personalised clinical treatment strategies. Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and conference proceedings for prospective trials published until 30 January 2025. Two researchers (X.J. and W.Z.) independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment and Methodological index for non-randomised studies tool. Statistical analyses were performed with R 4.4.2 using a random-effects model, including heterogeneity (I Results: Thirteen prospective clinical studies were included, comprising five randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and eight single-arm cohort studies, involving 1,681 patients. The pooled overall response rate (ORR) was 0.30 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.23-0.36; I Conclusions: Our analysis revealed that although ADCs demonstrate promising efficacy in advanced/metastatic NSCLC, the interpretability of these findings is constrained by significant interstudy heterogeneity. Current evidence lacks a clear superiority of ADCs monotherapy over standard chemotherapy. Future large-scale randomised trials should optimise the clinical use through combination approaches, subgroup efficacy analyses, and long-term safety assessments. Such studies are crucial to guide evidence-based strategies.

Indexed as

advanced non-small cell lung cancer (advanced NSCLC)Antibody-drug conjugate (ADC)prospective studiesrandomised controlled trial (RCT)single-arm meta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID41158249
PMCPMC12554454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.