ArticleTranslational cancer research2025
Computed tomography-based quantification of intra-tumoral heterogeneity for predicting treatment response to concurrent chemoradiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) constitutes a cornerstone of treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, NSCLC's intrinsic heterogeneity yields variable therapeutic responses. Noninvasive, quantitative assessment of intra-tumoral heterogeneity (ITH) may improve prediction of treatment efficacy. This study sought to derive ITH metrics from pretreatment contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and to assess their prognostic value for outcomes following CCRT in NSCLC patients. Methods: In this multicenter, retrospective study, pretreatment CT scans from NSCLC patients undergoing CCRT between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2023 were allocated to training (n=132) and validation (n=32) cohorts. Conventional radiomic features were extracted from the tumor region of interest. A Gaussian mixture model (GMM) determined three optimal tumor subregions, from which ecological diversity metrics were computed in Python (v3.6) and subjected to least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Support vector machine (SVM) generated both the ITH and C‑radiomics classifiers. Multivariable logistic regression then integrated clinical, C‑radiomics, and ITH predictors into a unified prognostic model, whose discriminative ability was quantified by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Patients were dichotomized by ITH and combined‑model thresholds to evaluate stratification of predicted response. Results: Thirteen ecological diversity metrics informed the ITH classifier. The ITH model achieved AUCs of 0.78 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.70-0.86] in training and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.59-0.94) in validation. Incorporation of clinical and radiomic features yielded a combined model with AUCs of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.86-0.98) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.72-1.00), respectively. According to the cutoff values of the ITH and combined models, patients were stratified (ITH model: 0.65; combined model: 0.53, 0.86), and significant differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were observed in the high-risk and low-risk groups (P<0.05). Conclusions: The CT‑based ITH model exhibited robust predictive accuracy, surpassing standalone clinical and conventional radiomic models. A unified model combining clinical, radiomic, and ITH features further enhanced prognostic precision for CCRT response in NSCLC. Both models successfully stratified patients by PFS and OS risk, underscoring their potential to inform personalized therapeutic decision‑making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.