ArticleTranslational cancer research2025
The prognostic impact of preoperative radiotherapy in stage I rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study revealing no survival benefit from SEER database analysis.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The predominant treatment modality for early-stage rectal cancer (RC) currently revolves around surgical interventions. Nonetheless, controversy persists regarding the omission of preoperative radiotherapy (RT) in early-stage patients, particularly those with T2N0M0 disease who are candidates for local excision. The debate focuses on RT's risk-benefit profile, with some evidence suggesting improved locoregional control, while other data indicate limited survival benefits alongside radiation-induced toxicity risks. This uncertainty necessitates large-scale clinical evaluations. This study aims to investigate whether preoperative RT is beneficial for stage I RC patients undergoing surgery. Methods: This retrospective cohort analysis included 16,961 stage I RC patients undergoing surgery without chemotherapy between 2004 and 2021, with follow-up through December 31, 2023, using data from population-based cancer registries of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Baseline factors included age at diagnosis, sex, RT status, year of diagnosis, stage at diagnosis, race/ethnicity, histologic type, surgical type, tumor size, and median household income. Kaplan-Meier (KM) curve analysis was used to explore the impact of preoperative RT on survival, with overall survival (OS) as the primary endpoint. Multivariate analysis of features associated with outcomes was conducted using Cox proportional hazards regression models. The 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was conducted to balance the confounding factors. Results: The cohort was stratified into three groups: preoperative RT (n=106), postoperative RT (n=355), and no RT (n=16,500). The study suggested that RT administered before surgery did not improve OS compared to no RT in stage I cancer patients who did not undergo chemotherapy and might even be associated with worse 5-year OS rates (61.9% Conclusions: This study advocates that preoperative RT is not recommended for Stage I RC patients who do not receive chemotherapy, regardless of whether patients have undergone local excision or radical resection. Furthermore, preoperative RT offered no survival advantage to patients with T2N0M0 disease who were undergoing for local excision, and, notably, it was associated with a substantial decline in OS among patients with T1N0M0 disease. However, given limitations, including the retrospective design, lack of RT dose details, and absence of local recurrence data, further clinical trials are urgently needed to explore optimal treatment approaches for early-stage RC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.