ArticleTranslational cancer research2025
Integrating prognosis-related genes with immune-related gene signature for development and validation of a survival stratification model for early-stage colorectal cancer.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Current prognostic factors are inadequate for identifying patients at risk of disease recurrence after treatment for early-stage colorectal cancer (CRC). Integrating genes into gene pairs, considering the relative ranking of gene expression levels, can effectively avoid the bias due to different sequencing platforms when using the absolute values of gene expression levels. The aim of this study is to build an individualized gene index based on gene-pairs to estimate prognosis in patients with early-stage CRC and to assist in the decision-making of adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: Clinical samples and gene expression data are acquired from public datasets including Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) GSE39582, GSE17536, GSE33113, GSE39084, and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Gene expression profiles from the Cluster Identification Tool (CIT) microarray dataset of 309 patients, who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy, were integrated with immune-related gene signature to generate a 10-gene pair index (GPI). Prognostic analysis was performed to assess the predictive value of GPI on 1,525 CRC patients who were assigned to a training cohort and two validation cohorts. Results: There were 309 prognostic-related genes integrated with 463 immune-related genes to construct a GPI consisting of 20 unique genes. The GPI significantly stratified patients into high- and low-risk groups in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) among early-stage CRC [hazard ratio (HR) =3.91, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.36-6.5]. A strong prognostic value was observed according to time-dependent ROC curve analysis [area under the curve (AUC) =0.753 at 2 years; AUC =0.770 at 3 years; AUC =0.775 at 5 years]. Besides, patients with adjuvant chemotherapy showed worse DFS than those without (HR =4.74, 95% CI: 2.28-9.82) among the GPI-identified low-risk group in early-stage CRC. The GPI-identified high-risk group obtained significantly higher immune and stromal infiltration. Several biological processes including apoptosis and angiogenesis were enriched among genes in the GPI. Compared with the commercialized index (Oncotype DX), GPI achieved higher accuracy (mean C-index, 0.81 Conclusions: An individualized gene index based on gene-pairs, which was robust against the technical biases across different sequencing platforms, was built to estimate prognosis in patients with early-stage CRC. The GPI model provides a new basis for the clinical strategic decision of whether early CRC patients should receive adjuvant chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.