Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41158208›Full record

ArticleJournal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques2025

3D-printed in vitro models of Stanford type B aortic dissection: A scoping review.

Matthias Niklas Hagedorn, Marcello Mächerle, Roger Karl, C Soeren Bergt, Dittmar Böckler, Sandy Engelhardt, Katrin Meisenbacher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matthias Niklas HagedornDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Marcello MächerleDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Roger KarlDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
C Soeren BergtDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Dittmar BöcklerDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sandy EngelhardtDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Katrin MeisenbacherDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-specific three-dimensional-printed phantoms have emerged as valuable tools for simulating Stanford type B aortic dissections in vitro, enabling detailed studies of dissection morphology, hemodynamics, and interventional techniques under controlled, anatomically realistic conditions. Despite their potential, current methodologies remain heterogeneous and lack standardization. This scoping review, compliant with the PRISMA guidelines, systematically evaluated literature describing additive-manufactured flexible aortic phantoms specifically for pulsatile flow experiments or endovascular procedures. From an initial pool of 120 publications, five studies met the inclusion criteria, all using clinical imaging data and PolyJet-technology with flexible photopolymers. Four studies used full-scale models to simulate hemodynamics or thoracic endovascular aortic repair, and one investigated imaging properties in smaller segments. Although these phantoms reliably replicate dissection anatomy and flow patterns, widespread adoption is constrained by resource demands, simplified wall mechanics, exclusion of smaller vessel branches, and variable fabrication methods. Additional limitations include material durability and single-use designs. Standardizing fabrication protocols and developing advanced biomimetic materials could significantly enhance the physiological accuracy, reproducibility, and practicality of these models. Patient-specific three-dimensional-printed type B aortic dissections phantoms thus represent potentially valuable tools for improving surgical training, procedural rehearsal, morphological insights, and device innovation, ultimately bridging benchtop simulations and clinical practice.

Indexed as

3D-printingPerfusion modelSimulationThree-dimensional phantomType B aortic dissection

Identifiers

PMID41158208
PMCPMC12555758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.