ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Retinal features as predictive indicators for high myopia: insights from explainable multi-machine learning models.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Defining the critical axial length threshold for transition from physiological growth to pathological fundus structural remodeling in adolescent myopia.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Quantitative color fundus photography parameters as potential biomarkers of axial length progression: evidence from a machine learning cohort study.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the role of retinal characteristics for high myopia (HM) prediction based on multi-machine learning (ML) and to provide an interpretable framework for the results. Methods: A total of 2981 patients (2981 eyes) were included, comprising 1191 HM eyes and 1790 non-HM eyes. A deep semantic segmentation network was used to quantify retinal structural parameters. Five ML algorithms were evaluated to develop predictive models, and SHapley Additive exPlanations method was applied to analyze feature contribution to the outcomes. Results: The eXtreme Gradient Boosting achieved an accuracy of 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-0.85), and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.87 (95% CI 0.84-0.89), outperforming other models. The 12 most important factors affecting prediction included tessellation density, seven vascular parameters, two parapapillary atrophy parameters, and two optic disc parameters. The tessellated density >0.025, width of parapapillary atrophy >400 um, parapapillary atrophy area >0.60 × 10 Conclusion: The XGBoost model outperformed other algorithms, and SHAP-derived cut-off values for critical risk factors enhanced clinical interpretability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.