ArticleInnovation in aging2025
Estimating the causal impact of chewing disability on depressive symptoms mediated by loneliness: a longitudinal marginal structural model study of older adults in Singapore.
Article in Innovation in aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Longitudinal Associations of Denture Use and Subjective Chewing Difficulty with Depressive Symptoms Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults: A Sex-Stratified Analysis of the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging (2006-2022).Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The effect of increases in physical activity on oral health and function in older adults in Singapore: A longitudinal causal inference study.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2026Article
- Oral Structural and Functional Impairment in Relation to Depressive Outcomes in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Data Resource Profile: The National Dental Centre Singapore Oral Disease Registry (NDCS-ODR).International journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Loneliness and Its Association with Depression, Aspiration Risk, and Conversation in Japanese Older Adults.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Establishment of a large-scale oral disease registry (NDCS-ODR) in a national specialty center.PloS one · 2026Article
- Reducing oral frailty improves functional independence in older Brazilians: a causal inference study of disability-free survival using longitudinal modified treatment policies.Innovation in aging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Chewing disability may contribute to depressive symptoms in older adults, but causal pathways, accounting for time-varying confounding factors, remain unexplored. Previous research shows an association between chewing disability, loneliness, and depression. This study examines the causal relationship between chewing disability and clinically significant depressive symptoms (CSDS) and whether loneliness mediates this association among older adults. Research Design and Methods: In total, 1,277 participants aged ≥60 years, without CSDS at baseline, were selected from a nationally representative study of older adults in Singapore (2009-2015, three waves). Marginal structural models were utilized to estimate total and indirect effects of chewing disability and CSDS over time, where loneliness was treated as a mediator. Results: Across the study period, 10.3% developed CSDS, 40.7% experienced loneliness, and 33.6% had chewing disability. Individuals with chewing disability had a 48% higher risk of CSDS (RR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.15-1.82), and the indirect effect through loneliness was 26% (RR: 1.26, 95% CI: 0.99-1.53; 17.3% of the total effect). Nonetheless, the estimates varied by the operationalization of chewing disability and loneliness. A broader definition of chewing disability showed stronger total effects (RR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.24-1.91), while a stricter loneliness threshold had a greater indirect effect (RR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.30-2.09; 21.8% of the total effect). Discussion and Implications: Chewing disability increases the risk of CSDS among older adults, with partial mediation by loneliness. Further research on oral rehabilitative interventions that improve chewing function and mitigate depressive symptoms in older adults is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.