Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41158119›Full record

ArticleInnovation in aging2025

Estimating the causal impact of chewing disability on depressive symptoms mediated by loneliness: a longitudinal marginal structural model study of older adults in Singapore.

John Rong Hao Tay, Gustavo G Nascimento, Angelique Chan, Rahul Malhotra, Maurizio S Tonetti, Marco A Peres

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Innovation in aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

John Rong Hao TayHealth Services Research and Population Health Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3042-3103
Gustavo G NascimentoNational Dental Research Institute Singapore, National Dental Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Angelique ChanHealth Services Research and Population Health Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Rahul MalhotraHealth Services Research and Population Health Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9978-4276
Maurizio S TonettiShanghai Perio-Implant Innovation Center, Institute for Oral Craniofacial and Sensory Research, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology-National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Marco A PeresHealth Services Research and Population Health Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Chewing disability may contribute to depressive symptoms in older adults, but causal pathways, accounting for time-varying confounding factors, remain unexplored. Previous research shows an association between chewing disability, loneliness, and depression. This study examines the causal relationship between chewing disability and clinically significant depressive symptoms (CSDS) and whether loneliness mediates this association among older adults. Research Design and Methods: In total, 1,277 participants aged ≥60 years, without CSDS at baseline, were selected from a nationally representative study of older adults in Singapore (2009-2015, three waves). Marginal structural models were utilized to estimate total and indirect effects of chewing disability and CSDS over time, where loneliness was treated as a mediator. Results: Across the study period, 10.3% developed CSDS, 40.7% experienced loneliness, and 33.6% had chewing disability. Individuals with chewing disability had a 48% higher risk of CSDS (RR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.15-1.82), and the indirect effect through loneliness was 26% (RR: 1.26, 95% CI: 0.99-1.53; 17.3% of the total effect). Nonetheless, the estimates varied by the operationalization of chewing disability and loneliness. A broader definition of chewing disability showed stronger total effects (RR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.24-1.91), while a stricter loneliness threshold had a greater indirect effect (RR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.30-2.09; 21.8% of the total effect). Discussion and Implications: Chewing disability increases the risk of CSDS among older adults, with partial mediation by loneliness. Further research on oral rehabilitative interventions that improve chewing function and mitigate depressive symptoms in older adults is needed.

Indexed as

DepressionEpidemiologyMasticationOral health

Identifiers

PMID41158119
PMCPMC12558686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.