ArticleInnovation in aging2025
Who stays? Understanding the attrition in a longitudinal aging study of older Chinese immigrants in the United States.
Article in Innovation in aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Despite the rapid growth of older Asian American populations, little is known about their retention and its associated factors in longitudinal aging studies, partially due to the limited longitudinal studies among this population. This study addresses this critical gap by examining key predictors of attrition in this understudied population. Research Design and Methods: Using data from the Population Study of Chinese Elderly in Chicago (PINE), a large longitudinal epidemiological study of older Chinese immigrants in the United States (US), we analyzed the effect of sociodemographic, immigration, health, and psychosocial characteristics on attrition status and various attrition patterns. Results: High levels of acculturation and longer length of stay in the US were associated with a higher likelihood of attrition. Also, participants with higher levels of educational attainment and loneliness were more likely to drop out of the study earlier. In addition, participants with lower income were more likely to remain in the study. Discussion and Implications: These results show unique attrition dynamics in older Asian immigrants, where acculturation and education paradoxically increase attrition risk. These findings highlight the need for tailored retention strategies to enhance continued participation in longitudinal aging studies among older Asian American immigrants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.