Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41158112›Full record

ArticleGastro hep advances2026

Plasma Proteins Invariant to Diet in Celiac Disease: Results From a Proteomics Study on the UK Biobank.

Isabel A Hujoel, Po-Ru Loh, Margaux L A Hujoel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastro hep advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Isabel A HujoelDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Po-Ru LohBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Margaux L A HujoelBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: Our serologic and pathologic markers of celiac disease normalize with a gluten-free diet. Identifying celiac disease in those who are already on a gluten-free diet is therefore difficult and currently requires a gluten challenge. The gluten challenge may have low sensitivity and is often not palatable to patients due to associated morbidity from gluten ingestion. We aimed to identify potential serologic markers of celiac disease invariant to diet by performing proteomic analysis. Methods: We performed a proteomic analysis using the UK Biobank, specifically looking for plasma protein levels associated with celiac disease among individuals self-reporting a gluten-free diet. Celiac disease was identified through the ICD-10 code of K90.0. We limited our analysis to those diagnosed with celiac disease prior to proteomic data being collected. We inverse-rank normalized proteomic measurements. Our primary analysis was looking at differential expression between those diagnosed with celiac disease who reported being gluten-free and controls. Results: A total of 1044 individuals received a diagnosis of celiac disease prior to proteomic analysis. Of these individuals, 141 were administered a dietary questionnaire, and 132 reported being gluten-free. There were 4 proteins which were significantly higher in this group, however only two were unique to celiac disease: carboxypeptidase A2 and integrin subunit beta 7. Conclusion: Although further diagnostic accuracy studies are required, this study identified 2 potential markers for celiac disease that are invariant to diet and commercially available. This has dramatic implications for clinical practice.

Indexed as

Celiac diseaseGluten challengeGluten-free dietNonceliac gluten sensitivityProteomics

Identifiers

PMID41158112
PMCPMC12554957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.