Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41158099›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA2026

The evolution of renal cell carcinoma classification.

Chin-Chen Pan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Chin-Chen PanDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.ORCID 0000-0001-9990-8972

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precise classification of diseases is essential for precision medicine to develop efficient, personalized treatments for cancer. Progress in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) classification is a paradigm that demonstrates how precise classification is achieved. RCC classification has evolved from purely morphological criteria to the sophisticated application of various laboratory modalities. With advancing techniques and multi-institutional collaboration, the latest World Health Organization (WHO) classification takes into account decades of studies on the nature of RCC, and is subsequently divided into six categories: clear cell renal tumors, papillary renal tumors, oncocytic and chromophobe renal tumors, collecting duct tumors, other renal tumors, and molecularly defined renal carcinomas. This review provides a historical perspective on how the current WHO classification was attained, followed by a compendium of different RCC types and their salient characteristics, including histopathological features, clinicopathological correlations, and molecular distinctiveness. This information should be shared among pathologists and clinicians to better translate pathological findings into effective clinical practice in terms of diagnosis, prognostication, and therapeutic planning.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsHumansWorld Health OrganizationClassificationRenal cell carcinomaWHO

Identifiers

PMID41158099
PMCPMC12900190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.