Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41158064›Full record

ArticleJournal of rehabilitation medicine2025

Psychometric properties of the Danish version of the resilience scale for adults in individuals with acquired brain or spinal cord injury, and their family members.

Karoline Yde Andersen, Anne Norup, Mia Moth Wolffbrandt, Fin Biering-Sørensen, Juan Carlos Arango-Lasprilla, Pernille Langer Soendergaard, Frederik Have Dornonville de la Cour

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Karoline Yde AndersenNeurorehabilitation Research and Knowledge Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.
Anne NorupNeurorehabilitation Research and Knowledge Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Neuroscience, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. anne.norup@regionh.dk.
Mia Moth WolffbrandtNeurorehabilitation Research and Knowledge Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Neuroscience, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Fin Biering-SørensenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Brain and Spinal Cord Injuries, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.
Juan Carlos Arango-LasprillaDepartment of Cell Biology and Histology, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Leioa, Spain; IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Spain.
Pernille Langer SoendergaardNeurorehabilitation-CPH, City of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark.
Frederik Have Dornonville de la CourNeurorehabilitation Research and Knowledge Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Neuroscience, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; The Elsass Foundation, Charlottenlund, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate validity and reliability of the Danish version of the Resilience Scale for Adults among individuals with acquired brain or spinal cord injury, and their family members.

designCross-sectional study. SUBJECTS/PATIENTS: Adults with acquired brain or spinal cord injury, and their family members.

methodsUnidimensionality, floor/ceiling effects, and internal consistency of the 6 subscales were analysed using confirmatory factor analysis. A series of models were estimated to investigate structural validity, and construct validity was analysed using correlations.

resultsFamily cohesion, Planned future, and Perception of self showed good reliability (ω = 0.79-0.83) and good model fit (Comparative fit index: 0.986-1.000). Social resources and Social competence demonstrated adequate reliability (ω = 0.81 and 0.75) and good fit, accounting for local dependency. Structured style had poor reliability (ω = 0.53) and model misfit. The Resilience Scale for Adults was best represented by a 6-factor correlated model, compared with a single first- or second-order factor, but all models showed inadequate fit. All scale scores correlated negatively with scores of anxiety and depression.

conclusionAll but 1 subscale demonstrated good psychometric properties. The Resilience Scale for Adults can be used to measure different aspects related to resilience for this mixed population.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesFamilyPsychological TestsPsychometricsResilience, PsychologicalSpinal Cord InjuriesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiver BurdenCaregiversCross-Sectional StudiesDenmarkFemaleHumans

Identifiers

PMID41158064
PMCPMC12584011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.