Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41157986›Full record

ArticleSociology of health & illness2025

Gut Healthism: The Penetrating Gaze and Depoliticising Forces of Direct-to-Consumer Microbiome Testing Kits.

Erica Zurawski, Maya Hey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Erica ZurawskiDepartment of Environmental Studies, SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4052-1682
Maya HeyCentre for the Social Study of Microbes, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-9364-6334

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, scientific attention towards the gut has interpellated everyday consumers to test and intervene on their gut microbiome in the hopes of improving their overall health. Based on a discursive analysis of direct-to-consumer testing kits, we detail how their rhetoric individualises health interventions in the name of procuring a 'healthy' gut microbiome while obscuring the social, communal and environmentally predicated relations that inhere to a kind of health reliant on microbes. Drawing on Robert Crawford's original conceptualisation, we identify an emergent 'gut healthism' amid the tangle of the contemporary microbiome revolution, technopolitical outgrowths of the Human Genome Project, collapsing healthcare infrastructures, and the ills of the modern industrialised food system. Through gut healthism, we argue that the kits enable a hyperfixation on the gut, which becomes mediated by scientific expertise to view and quantify microbes as health markers, whose gaze disembodies guts and depoliticises diet. By examining current moves in gut microbiome products, we also detail the divergences and complications that gut healthism brings to Crawford's framework, highlighting the problem with solutions such as DTC kits and how they do little to address the grand health challenges of our time.

Indexed as

Direct-To-Consumer Screening and TestingGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumans

Identifiers

PMID41157986
PMCPMC7618841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.