ArticleGenome biology and evolution2025
Phylogenomic Analysis of Deep-Branching Telonemid.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The evolutionary history of eukaryotic supergroups has been investigated primarily by large-scale phylogenomics, but one major hindrance to continued progress is that some major eukaryotic groups have extremely sparse sampling. The phylum Telonemia is one such group. Environmental sampling shows two major subgroups of Telonemia, but there are only multigene phylogenomic data from three closely related species belonging to one of the subgroups, TEL1. Here, a single cell was isolated from the pelagic Pacific Ocean, which SSU phylogenetic analysis reveals to be a telonemid of the TEL2 subgroup and distantly related to telonemids with multigene sequence data. Through single-cell transcriptome sequencing and phylogenomic analysis, we investigate the impact of this new telonemid on the relation of Telonemia to the Stramenopila-Alveolata-Rhizaria supergroup (SAR) and other sparsely sampled or historically unstable supergroups, namely, Hemimastigophora, Provora, and Haptista. Our maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis supports Telonemia as sister to Hemimastigophora, together as sister to SAR, with Haptista and Provora forming a clade and sister to all three. However, our Bayesian analysis failed to converge on a topology. Throughout different Telonemia sampling, gene sampling, alignment trimming, and site removal schemes, the sisterhood of Telonemia and Hemimastigophora remained largely supported in ML trees, even when their sisterhood to SAR dissolved, as was the sisterhood of Haptista and Provora. Inclusion of our TEL2 telonemid largely did not influence these relationships. However, our results also highlight the unstable placements of aforementioned groups throughout variations of our data, of which subsets give results consistent with other previously published analyses of this scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.