Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41157915›Full record

ArticleVeterinary and comparative oncology2026

Polarisation-Sensitive Optical Coherence Tomography for Surgical Margin Evaluation and Diagnosis of Excised Canine Cutaneous and Subcutaneous Tumours.

Christina E Orona, Ryan Jennings, Julianna DiMichele, Gabrielle Fontes, Carley Johnson, Jorge Santana Mignucci, Nikesh Patel, Yi-Fan Shen, Hannah Weaver, Jocosa Yasenchack and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary and comparative oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Christina E OronaDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Ryan JenningsDepartment of Veterinary Biosciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Julianna DiMicheleDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Gabrielle FontesDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Carley JohnsonDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5482-5814
Jorge Santana MignucciDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9628-5312
Nikesh PatelDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Yi-Fan ShenDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Hannah WeaverCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Comparative Medicine Program, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Jocosa YasenchackDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Laura E SelmicDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6695-6273

Funding

VCA resident funds
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraoperative surgical margin evaluation is not routine in veterinary medicine. Polarisation-sensitive optical coherence tomography (PS-OCT) is a variant of spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) that can provide real-time cross-sectional imaging of surgical margins with additional information about the polarisation of light in tissues. The aims of this study were (1) to compare PS-OCT surgical margin images to histopathology of excised canine skin and subcutaneous tumour specimens, and (2) to determine if the addition of PS-OCT images improved the diagnostic accuracy of surgical margin assessment. The authors hypothesised that PS-OCT image features would resemble histopathologic tissue features and the addition of PS-OCT images would improve the accuracy of margin assessment. Sixty-one dogs with 79 skin and subcutaneous tumours were prospectively enrolled. Tumours were excised, the surgical margins were imaged with OCT and then submitted for histopathology. Six masked readers first received image interpretation training in SD-OCT only, followed by training in combined SD-OCT and PS-OCT 1 week later. The readers interpreted each image or video for the presence of cancer and the results were compared to histopathology. PS-OCT imaging features of surgical margin tissues were consistent with tissue histopathologic features at low power. The overall reader median sensitivity and specificity were 90.9% and 95.6% for SD-OCT only and 90.9% and 91.3% for combined SD-OCT and PS-OCT. The addition of PS-OCT images did not improve the diagnostic accuracy of the surgical margin assessment for skin and subcutaneous tumours but resulted in high accuracy of margin interpretation with readers of varying experience.

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesMargins of ExcisionSkin NeoplasmsSoft Tissue NeoplasmsTomography, Optical CoherenceAnimalsDogsFemaleMaleProspective Studieshistopathologyimagingsmall animalsurgical oncology

Identifiers

PMID41157915
PMCPMC12875761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.