ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2025
Plasma proteomic Alzheimer's risk score: Biological age clock and pseudotime trajectory.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Aptamer-Based Platforms for Human Aging Biomarkers: Multiplexed Proteomics, Biosensors and Translational Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Deep Plasma Proteomics-Based Diagnostic Panel for Early Detection of Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment.Journal of proteome research · 2026Article
- Immunosenescence in systemic and multi-organ aging: mechanisms, inter-organ crosstalk, and translational opportunities.npj aging · 2026Review
- Associations between sleep disturbance and cerebrospinal fluid Aβ, and shared proteomic signatures in Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Plasma proteomic Alzheimer's risk score: Biological age clock and pseudotime trajectory.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- Associations of proteomic and epigenetic aging clocks with Alzheimer's disease phenotypes: An exploratory analysis.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAlzheimer's disease (AD) involves progressive cognitive decline. Plasma proteomics data may provide insights into disease risk and mechanisms.
methodsPlasma proteomics data (N = 498) by the SomaScan 7k platform from the Indiana AD Research Center was used to calculate proteomics-based Alzheimer's risk scores: organ-specific aging clocks and pseudotime trajectory. The Alzheimer's risk scores were investigated for associations with plasma- and imaging-based biomarkers for AD and diagnosis and evaluated for classification performance for diagnosis and biomarker positivity status.
resultsCognition-optimized brain and liver age acceleration showed significant associations with AD diagnosis and biomarkers. Pseudotime showed a molecular trajectory from cognitively normal to AD individuals, in association with plasma and imaging biomarkers. Previously known plasma biomarkers yielded better classification performance with inclusion of proteomics-based Alzheimer's risk scores. DISCUSSION: The findings highlight proteomics-derived biological aging clocks and pseudotime trajectory as potential biomarkers to complement current biomarker frameworks and identify disease mechanisms. HIGHLIGHTS: Plasma proteomic aging clocks and pseudotime provide potential markers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk. Cognition-optimized brain aging and pseudotime link to diagnosis and AD biomarkers. Brain aging clock and pseudotime improve the diagnosis classification performance. Pseudotime outperformed established plasma biomarkers for diagnosis classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.