Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41157877›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025

Was descent in Neolithic and Bronze Age Europe patrilineal or bilateral?

Léa Guyon, Evelyne Heyer, Raphaëlle Chaix

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Léa GuyonUMR7206 Eco-Anthropologie, CNRS, MNHN, Université Paris Cité, Paris, Île-de-France 75116, France.ORCID 0009-0006-9415-9152
Evelyne HeyerUMR7206 Eco-Anthropologie, CNRS, MNHN, Université Paris Cité, Paris, Île-de-France 75116, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0266-3196
Raphaëlle ChaixUMR7206 Eco-Anthropologie, CNRS, MNHN, Université Paris Cité, Paris, Île-de-France 75116, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5160-1293

Funding

Ecole normale supérieureFondation Fyssen
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many studies have attempted to gain insights into the kinship systems of past human populations using ancient DNA data. Several studies focusing on Neolithic and Bronze Age European sites reported a high male relatedness and a low Y chromosome diversity, and concluded that descent in these past societies was patrilineal and residence was patrilocal. Here, we used simulations to assess male and female relatedness as well as the uniparental genetic diversity expected under different types of descent and residence systems. We confirm that ancient DNA data from most of these sites are compatible with patrilocal residence; however, the claim that many Neolithic and Bronze Age European populations had patrilineal descent is not supported.

Indexed as

DNA, AncientGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationWhite PeopleChromosomes, Human, YEuropeFemaleHistory, AncientHumansMaleDNA, Ancientancient DNAkinshipmodellingpatrilineal descentuniparental

Identifiers

PMID41157877
PMCPMC12569474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.