Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41157824›Full record

ArticleOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2025

The barriers and facilitators to primary care optometrists supporting patients with low vision in England.

Emily Charlesworth, Tarnjit Sehmbi, Michael Bowen, Shahina Pardhan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. The barriers and facilitators to primary care optometrists supporting patients with low vision in England.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emily CharlesworthFaculty of Health, Education, Medicine and Social Care, Vision and Eye Research Institute, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4036-2300
Tarnjit SehmbiFaculty of Health, Education, Medicine and Social Care, Vision and Eye Research Institute, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
Michael BowenThe College of Optometrists, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4818-9450
Shahina PardhanFaculty of Health, Education, Medicine and Social Care, Vision and Eye Research Institute, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

Anglia Ruskin University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionResearch suggests that patients with low vision identify optometrists as their core eye care provider within the community; hence, optometrists are well placed to provide support, advice and potentially certify patients. A qualitative study was conducted to ascertain the barriers and facilitators to primary care optometrists supporting patients with low vision.

methodsAn online questionnaire used open-ended questions to investigate optometrists' knowledge of the Certification of Vision Impairment and registration processes, and the barriers they faced when providing support to patients with low vision. Unmet training needs on low vision and whether optometrists would be happy to certify patients were also explored; data were analysed using deductive thematic analysis.

resultsA total of 148 questionnaires were completed by optometrists in England between October 2023 and January 2024. Varying levels of knowledge were found regarding the certification and registration process. Three barrier-related themes were identified. These were system barriers, practitioner barriers and patient barriers. Four themes were identified related to facilitators to supporting patients with low vision. These were training methods, training needs, low vision pathway, including optometrists' ability to certify patients and communication between services.

conclusionsWith appropriate remuneration, optometrists reported positively with regard to upskilling and extending their scope of practice to ensure the best care for patients. Optometrists were found to be happy to certify patients if appropriate training and remuneration were received. This would involve the development of a funded Low Vision Pathway in England. Optometrists would benefit from further Continuing Professional Development training with elements from local Eye Clinic Liaison Officers, low vision practitioners and the Hospital Eye Service to improve knowledge around the certification and registration process and local support services available.

Indexed as

OptometristsOptometryPrimary Health CareVision, LowAdultEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSurveys and Questionnairesbarriersfacilitatorslow visionoptometristprimary care

Identifiers

PMID41157824
PMCPMC12682099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.