ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Feature Engineering Method for Smartphone-Based Fall Detection.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A fall is defined as an event in which a person inadvertently comes to rest on the ground, floor, or another lower level. It is the second leading cause of unintentional death worldwide, with the elderly population (aged 65 and above) at the highest risk. In addition to preventing falls, timely and accurate detection is crucial to enable effective treatment and reduce potential injury. In this work, we propose a smartphone-based method for fall detection, employing K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifiers to predict fall events from accelerometer data. We evaluated the proposed method on two simulated datasets (UniMiB SHAR and MobiAct) and one real-world fall dataset (FARSEEING), performing both same-dataset and cross-dataset evaluations. In same-dataset evaluation on UniMiB SHAR, the method achieved an average accuracy of 98.45% in Leave-One-Subject-Out (LOSO) cross-validation. On MobiAct, it achieved a peak accuracy of 99.89% using KNN. In cross-dataset validation on MobiAct, the highest accuracy reached 96.41%, while on FARSEEING, the method achieved 95.35% sensitivity and 98.12% specificity. SHAP-based interpretability analysis was further conducted to identify the most influential features and provide insights into the model's decision-making process. These results demonstrate the high effectiveness, robustness, and transparency of the proposed approach in detecting falls across different datasets and scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.