Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41157508›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

EEG-Based Personal Identification by Special Design Domain-Adaptive Autoencoder.

Muhammed Esad Oztemel, Ömer Muhammet Soysal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Muhammed Esad OztemelDivision of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.
Ömer Muhammet SoysalDivision of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8832-9171

Funding

STABILITY' (symptomatic review during biologic therapy) Review in Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseP20GM103424 · NIGMS · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV A&M COL BATON ROUGE · PI VLADIMIR N CHOULJENKO · 2012 to 2026
$57.4M
National Institute of Health P20GM103424-20NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103424
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individual brain activity patterns derived from electroencephalogram (EEG) data offer a unique source for personal identification, introducing a novel approach to the field. Autoencoders are well-known machine learning models that automate feature extraction, which is a crucial step in biometric identification. Among various types of autoencoders, the domain-adaptive autoencoder (DAAE) is explored for feature extraction. The extracted latent features are employed by four machine learning classifiers, KNN, ANN, SVM and RF, for personal identification. Two domain adaptation approaches were presented. The proposed frameworks were evaluated in a longitudinal setting, using three types of EEG recordings: resting state, auditory and cognitive stimuli. Model performance was assessed through experiments involving seven-, five- and two-subject classification tasks. The highest identification accuracy, 100%, was achieved by the SVM-based model in the two-subject experiment, using features extracted with the uniform referential DAAE. Similarly, the RF-based model attained an accuracy of 99.84% in the two-subject experiment when trained on features obtained from the softmin referential DAAE. As expected, accuracy declined with an increasing number of subjects in the dataset, reflecting the difficulty of multi-subject classification.

Indexed as

Biometric IdentificationElectroencephalographyAdultAlgorithmsAutoencoderBrainHumansMachine LearningMaleSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedSupport Vector Machineautoencoderbiometricbrainprintdomain generationEEGfingerprintidentification

Identifiers

PMID41157508
PMCPMC12567768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.