ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
EEG-Based Personal Identification by Special Design Domain-Adaptive Autoencoder.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Data-Efficient EEG-Based Person Identification via Time-Interval-Based Multi-Positive Contrastive Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Balancing noise reduction and neural signature preservation in EEG biometrics.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Extraction of brainprint by means of autoencoder with attention mechanism.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Article
- Remaining Useful Life Prediction for Bearings Across Domains via a Subdomain Adaptation Network Driven by Spectral Clustering.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Individual brain activity patterns derived from electroencephalogram (EEG) data offer a unique source for personal identification, introducing a novel approach to the field. Autoencoders are well-known machine learning models that automate feature extraction, which is a crucial step in biometric identification. Among various types of autoencoders, the domain-adaptive autoencoder (DAAE) is explored for feature extraction. The extracted latent features are employed by four machine learning classifiers, KNN, ANN, SVM and RF, for personal identification. Two domain adaptation approaches were presented. The proposed frameworks were evaluated in a longitudinal setting, using three types of EEG recordings: resting state, auditory and cognitive stimuli. Model performance was assessed through experiments involving seven-, five- and two-subject classification tasks. The highest identification accuracy, 100%, was achieved by the SVM-based model in the two-subject experiment, using features extracted with the uniform referential DAAE. Similarly, the RF-based model attained an accuracy of 99.84% in the two-subject experiment when trained on features obtained from the softmin referential DAAE. As expected, accuracy declined with an increasing number of subjects in the dataset, reflecting the difficulty of multi-subject classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.