ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Wearable EEG Sensor Analysis for Cognitive Profiling in Educational Contexts.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) provides a powerful means of capturing real-time neural activity, enabling the study of cognitive processes during complex learning tasks. This study explores the application of wearable EEG and advanced signal analysis to examine cognitive profiles of 30 sixth-grade students engaged in fraction learning. Using validated estimations alongside interactive digital tools such as Fraction Lab and the Diamond Paper task, EEG recordings were processed to evaluate spectral dynamics across delta, theta, alpha, and beta bands. Results revealed that lower-performing students exhibited elevated delta and theta power under cognitive load, whereas higher-performing students showed more stable beta activity linked to cognitive control. These findings highlight the utility of EEG-based signal analysis for identifying neurocognitive markers associated with conceptual and procedural knowledge (PK) in mathematics. The integration of such methodologies supports the development of precision-oriented educational strategies grounded in objective neural data. Clustering further revealed three learner profiles: Core Support Needed, Developing, and Advanced, while classification analyses confirmed that EEG features, especially gamma and beta oscillations, reliably distinguished among them, underscoring the potential of neurocognitive markers to guide adaptive instruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.