ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Review of Strain-Distributed Optical Fiber Sensors for Geohazard Monitoring: An Update.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable Fault Diagnosis of Shearer Power-Core Cables from Sensor-Accessible Terminal Electrical Responses.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Blind Self-Supervised Denoising of In Situ BOTDR Strain Data Using TrendBlend-BSFormer for Underwater Flexible Mattress Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Geohazards pose significant dangers to human safety, infrastructures, and the environment, highlighting the need for advanced monitoring techniques for early damage detection and structure management. The distributed optical fiber sensors (DFOS) are strain, temperature, and vibration monitoring tools characterized by minimal intrusiveness, accuracy, ease of deployment, and the ability to perform measurements with high spatial resolution. Although these sensors rely on well-established measurement techniques, available for over 40 years, their diffusion within monitoring and early warning systems is still limited, and there is a certain mistrust towards them. In this regard, based on several case studies, the implementation of DFOS for early warning of various geotechnical hazards, such as landslides, earthquakes and subsidence, is discussed, providing a comparative analysis of the typical advantages and limitations of the different systems. The results show that real-time monitoring systems based on well-established distributed fiber-optic sensing techniques are now mature enough to enable reliable and long-term geotechnical applications, identifying a market segment that is only minimally saturated by using other monitoring techniques. More challenging remains the application of the technique for vibration detection that still requires improved interrogation technologies and standardized practices before it can be used in large-scale, real-time early warning systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.