ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Efficiency Evaluation of Sampling Density for Indoor Building LiDAR Point-Cloud Segmentation.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A BIM-Guided Virtual-to-Real Framework for Component-Level Semantic Segmentation of Construction Site Point Clouds.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prior studies on indoor LiDAR point-cloud semantic segmentation consistently report that sampling density strongly affects segmentation accuracy as well as runtime and memory, establishing an accuracy-efficiency trade-off. Nevertheless, in practice, the density is often chosen heuristically and reported under heterogeneous protocols, which limits quantitative guidance. We present a unified evaluation framework that treats density as the sole independent variable. To control architectural variability, three representative backbones-PointNet, PointNet++, and DGCNN-are each augmented with an identical Point Transformer module, yielding PointNet-Trans, PointNet++-Trans, and DGCNN-Trans trained and tested under one standardized protocol. The framework couples isotropic voxel-guided uniform down-sampling with a decision rule integrating three signals: (i) accuracy sufficiency, (ii) the onset of diminishing efficiency, and (iii) the knee of the accuracy-density curve. Experiments on scan-derived indoor point clouds (with BIM-derived counterparts for contrast) quantify the accuracy-runtime trade-off and identify an engineering-feasible operating band of 1600-2900 points/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.