ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
DL-AoD Estimation-Based 5G Positioning Using Directionally Transmitted Synchronization Signals.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper introduces a method for estimating the Downlink Angle of Departure (DL-AoD) of 5G User Equipment (UE) from measured signal strengths of directionally transmitted synchronization signals. Based on estimated DL-AoD values, from two or more anchor nodes, the position of the UE was estimated. Unlike most prior work, which is simulation-based or relies on custom testbeds, this study uses real measurements from an operational 5G network in an industrial factory environment. A deterministic estimator was derived, but multipath and unknown beam characteristics limit its accuracy. To address this, machine learning was applied to automatically adapt to the environment. Previous simulation studies reported 90th-percentile DL-AoD estimation errors below 2°, while experimental works achieved best-case accuracies of 5-6°. In this study, the experimental DL-AoD estimation error remained below 4° for 90% of the measurements, indicating improved real-world performance. Reported positioning errors in the literature range from 3.8 m to 140 m, whereas the 13.2 m error obtained here lies near the midpoint of this range, confirming the practicality of the proposed method in industrial environments. Compared to existing approaches, this work demonstrates high angular accuracy using only sub-6 GHz beams in a realistic industrial scenario without detailed knowledge of antenna beam patterns and channel state. The findings demonstrate that standard 5G signals can provide accurate indoor localization without additional infrastructure, offering a practical path toward cost-effective positioning in industrial IoT and automation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.