ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
PPG-Net 4: Deep-Learning-Based Approach for Classification of Blood Flow Using Non-Invasive Dual Photoplethysmography (PPG) Signals.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease diagnosis heavily relies on accurate blood flow assessments, traditionally performed using invasive and often uncomfortable methods like catheterization. This research introduces PPG-Net 4, an innovative deep learning approach for non-invasive blood flow pattern classification using dual photoplethysmography (PPG) signals. By leveraging advanced machine learning techniques, the proposed method addresses critical limitations in current diagnostic technologies. The study employed a novel dual-sensor arrangement capturing PPG signals from two body locations, generating a comprehensive dataset from 75 participants. Advanced signal processing techniques, including mel spectrogram generation and mel-frequency cepstral coefficient extraction, enabled sophisticated feature representation. The deep learning model, PPG-Net 4, demonstrated good capability at classifying the following five distinct blood flow patterns: laminar, turbulent, stagnant, pulsatile, and oscillatory. The experimental results revealed strong classification performance, with F1-scores ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 across different flow patterns. The highest accuracy was observed for pulsatile flow (F1-score: 0.92), underscoring the model's precision and reliability. This approach not only provides a non-invasive alternative to traditional diagnostic methods but also offers a potentially useful technique for early cardiovascular disease detection and continuous monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.