ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Review of the Research Progress of Sensor Monitoring Technology in Harsh Engineering Environments.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experimental Evaluation of Wi-Fi and BLE Smart Particles in a Rotating Drum: Link-Budget-Normalised RSSI Characterisation and IMU Validation of the Wi-Fi Particle.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Intelligent chemical sensors: learning-enabled platforms for adaptive chemical detection.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Lab-to-Field Transition in FBG Sensors: A Quantitative Assessment of Literature-Reported Deployment Maturity.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A Multisource Hardware Sensing Signal Fusion Network for Robust State Prediction and Anomaly Perception.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Triboelectric Nanogenerators Promote Self-Powered Sensing and Intelligent Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Robots in mine search and rescue operations: a review of platforms and design requirements.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the continuous growth in the demand for safety assurance in major projects and monitoring in extreme environments, sensor technology is facing challenges in harsh working conditions such as high temperatures, high pressures, and complex liquid media. This article focuses on typical complex environments such as underground and marine environments, systematically reviewing the basic principles, performance characteristics and the latest application progress of mechanical, optical and acoustic sensors in complex environments, and deeply analyzing their applicable boundaries and technical bottlenecks. The transmission mechanism of sensor data and the system architecture of the engineering monitoring and early warning platform were further explored, and their key roles in real-time perception and intelligent decision-making were evaluated. Finally, the core challenges and development opportunities currently faced by complex environmental sensing systems are summarized, and the future development directions, such as multi-parameter fusion, autonomous perception and edge intelligence, are prospected. This paper aims to provide a systematic theoretical basis and engineering practice reference for the design of sensors and the construction of monitoring systems in extreme environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.