ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Assessment of Gait and Balance in Elderly Individuals with Knee Osteoarthritis Using Inertial Measurement Units.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Altered Spatiotemporal and Kinematic Gait in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Article
- Dynamic Gait Stability Estimated Using One or Two Inertial Measurement Units Worn on the Human Body.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent condition in older adults that often results in impaired gait and balance, increased risk of falls, and reduced quality of life. Conventional clinical assessments may not adequately capture these deficiencies. This study investigated the gait and balance of elderly individuals with knee OA using wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs). Forty-four participants with Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2-3 knee OA (71.23 ± 5.75 years) and forty-five age-matched controls (70.87 ± 4.30 years) completed dynamic balance (balance board), static balance (single-leg stance), 'timed up and go' (TUG), and normal walking tasks. Between 2 and 8 IMUs, depending on the task, were placed on the head, chest, waist, knees, ankles, soles, and balance board to record kinematic data. Balance was quantified using absolute angular velocity and linear acceleration, with group differences analyzed by MANOVA and Bonferroni-adjusted univariate tests. The participants with knee OA exhibited greater gait asymmetry, although the difference was not significant. However, they consistently demonstrated higher absolute angular velocities than controls across most body segments during static and dynamic tasks, indicating reduced postural stability. No group differences were observed in TUG performance. These findings suggest that IMU-based measures, particularly angular velocity, are sensitive to balance impairment detection in knee OA. Incorporating IMU technology into clinical assessments may facilitate early identification of instability and guide targeted interventions to reduce fall risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.