ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Estimating Sleep-Stage Distribution from Respiratory Sounds via Deep Audio Segmentation.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate assessment of sleep architecture is critical for diagnosing and managing sleep disorders, which significantly impact global health and well-being. While polysomnography (PSG) remains the clinical gold standard, its inherent intrusiveness, high cost, and logistical complexity limit its utility for routine or home-based monitoring. Recent advances highlight that subtle variations in respiratory dynamics, such as respiratory rate and cycle regularity, exhibit meaningful correlations with distinct sleep stages and could serve as valuable non-invasive biomarkers. In this work, we propose a framework for estimating sleep stage distribution-specifically Wake, Light (N1+N2), Deep (N3), and REM-based on respiratory audio captured over a single sleep episode. The framework comprises three principal components: (1) a segmentation module that identifies distinct respiratory cycles in respiratory sounds using a fine-tuned Transformer-based architecture; (2) a feature extraction module that derives a suite of statistical, spectral, and distributional descriptors from these segmented respiratory patterns; and (3) stage-specific regression models that predict the proportion of time spent in each sleep stage. Experiments on the public PSG-Audio dataset (287 subjects; mean 5.3 h per subject), using subject-wise cross-validation, demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed approach. The segmentation model achieved lower RMSE and MAE in predicting respiratory rate and cycle duration, outperforming classical signal-processing baselines. For sleep stage proportion prediction, the proposed method yielded favorable RMSE and MAE across all stages, with the TabPFN model consistently delivering the best results. By quantifying interpretable respiratory features and intentionally avoiding black-box end-to-end modeling, our system may support transparent, contact-free sleep monitoring using passive audio.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.