ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Visual Function in Athletes from Different Team Sports and Non-Athlete Controls.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychomotor Performance in Esports Players: A Comparative Study of Visual Reaction Time and Hand-Eye Coordination.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Visio-spatial intelligence in athletes: comparison of field hockey players and non-athletes.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visual skills are increasingly recognized as critical to athletic performance, yet it remains unclear whether participation in specific team sports is associated with enhanced visual function. This cross-sectional study compared visual acuity, peripheral vision, stereoacuity, ocular alignment, and refractive error among 52 participants aged 15-56 years: basketball (n = 10), futsal (n = 9), hockey (n = 12), roller derby (n = 9), and non-athlete controls (n = 12). Standardized assessments included best-corrected visual acuity (logMAR), Hirschberg shift, peripheral perception using a tachistoscope, stereoacuity with the Randot
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.