Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41157288›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Safety in Spine Surgery: Risk Factors for Intraoperative Blood Loss and Management Strategies.

Magdalena Rybaczek, Piotr Kowalski, Zenon Mariak, Michał Grabala, Joanna Suszczyńska, Tomasz Łysoń, Paweł Grabala

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. [Blood Loss in Open Spine Surgeries - Preoperative Estimate vs Reality].Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Risk factors for poor functional outcomes at one year in biportal endoscopic spine surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Magdalena RybaczekDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Bialystok, M. Sklodowskiej-Curie 24A, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9627-7781
Piotr KowalskiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Regional Specialized Hospital, ul. Dekerta 1, 66-400 Gorzow, Poland.
Zenon MariakDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Bialystok, M. Sklodowskiej-Curie 24A, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4132-9278
Michał Grabala2nd Clinical Department of General and Gastroenterogical Surgery, Medical University of Bialystok, M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 24A, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland.
Joanna Suszczyńska2nd Clinical Department of General and Gastroenterogical Surgery, Medical University of Bialystok, M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 24A, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland.
Tomasz ŁysońDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Bialystok, M. Sklodowskiej-Curie 24A, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9757-8276
Paweł GrabalaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Polish-Mother's Memorial Hospital Research Institute, Rzgowska 281/289, 93-338 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7059-2935

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMassive intraoperative blood loss (IBL) is a serious complication in complex spine surgeries such as deformity correction, multilevel fusion, tumor resection, and revision procedures. While no strict definition exists, blood loss exceeding 1500 mL or 20% of estimated blood volume is generally considered clinically significant. Excessive bleeding increases the risk of hemodynamic instability, transfusion-related complications, postoperative infection, and prolonged hospitalization.

methodsThis narrative review summarizes the current understanding of the incidence, risk factors, anatomical vulnerabilities, and evidence-based strategies for managing IBL in spine surgery through comprehensive literature analysis of recent studies and clinical guidelines.

resultsKey risk factors include patient characteristics (anemia, obesity, advanced age, medication use), surgical variables (multilevel instrumentation, revision status, operative time), and pathological conditions (hypervascular tumors, severe deformity). Perioperative medication management is critical, requiring discontinuation of NSAIDs (5-7 days), antiplatelet agents (5-7 days), and NOACs (48-72 h) preoperatively to minimize bleeding risk. The thoracolumbar junction and hypervascular spinal lesions are especially prone to bleeding due to dense vascular anatomy. Evidence-based management strategies include comprehensive preoperative optimization, intraoperative hemostatic techniques, antifibrinolytic agents, topical hemostatic products, cell salvage technology, and structured transfusion protocols.

conclusionsEffective management of massive IBL requires a multimodal approach combining preoperative risk assessment and medication optimization, intraoperative hemostatic strategies including tranexamic acid administration, advanced monitoring techniques, and coordinated transfusion protocols. Particular attention to perioperative management of anticoagulant and antiplatelet medications is essential for bleeding risk mitigation. Understanding patient-specific risk factors, surgical complexity, and anatomical considerations enables surgeons to implement targeted prevention and management strategies, ultimately improving patient outcomes and reducing complications in high-risk spine surgery procedures.

Indexed as

anticoagulantsantiplateletshemostasismassive blood lossNOACsperioperative managementrisk factorsspine surgerytranexamic acidtransfusion

Identifiers

PMID41157288
PMCPMC12565576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.