ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Applications of Modern Cell Therapies: The Latest Data in Ophthalmology.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering cardiac regeneration using stem cells: Cellular sources, differentiation signatures, targeted delivery, and functional recovery.Regenerative therapy · 2026Review
- Evidence architecture of glaucoma-related biomaterials reveals an uneven transition toward smart materials, additive manufacturing, and functional tissue engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cell-based therapeutics are redefining interventions for vision loss by enabling tissue replacement, regeneration, and neuroprotection. This review surveys contemporary cellular strategies in ophthalmology through the lenses of therapeutic effectiveness, translational readiness, and governance. We profile principal sources-embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells, mesenchymal stromal cells, retinal pigment epithelium, retinal progenitor and limbal stem cells-and enabling platforms including extracellular vesicles, encapsulated cell technology and biomaterial scaffolds. We synthesize clinical evidence across age-related macular degeneration, inherited retinal dystrophies, and corneal injury/limbal stem-cell deficiency, and highlight emerging applications for glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy. Delivery routes (subretinal, intravitreal, anterior segment) and graft formats (single cells, sheets/patches, organoids) are compared using standardized structural and functional endpoints. Persistent barriers include GMP-compliant derivation and release testing; differentiation fidelity, maturation, and potency; genomic stability and tumorigenicity risk; graft survival, synaptic integration, and immune rejection despite ocular immune privilege; the scarcity of validated biomarkers and harmonized outcome measures and ethical, regulatory, and health-economic constraints. Promising trajectories span off-the-shelf allogeneic products, patient-specific iPSC-derived grafts, organoid and 3D-bioprinted tissues, gene-plus-cell combinations, and cell-free extracellular-vesicle therapeutics. Overall, cell-based therapies remain investigational. With adequately powered trials, methodological harmonization, long-term surveillance, scalable xeno-free manufacturing, and equitable access frameworks, they may eventually become standards of care; at present, approvals are limited to specific products/indications and regions, and no cell therapy is the standard of care for retinal disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.