ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Sperm Quality and Welfare of Sexually Mature Boars Supplemented with Partially Fermentable Insoluble Fiber.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dietary fiber plays an important role in animal nutrition by influencing gut health, feed intake, and metabolism. In swine production, studies suggest that fibers may also affect reproductive traits, but findings remain inconsistent, especially in adult boars. This study evaluated the effects of partially fermentable insoluble fiber (PFIF) on semen quality, behavior, and general health of adult boars. Thirty animals were assigned to a completely randomized design with two treatments: (1) CON: no fiber supplementation, and (2) PFIF: fiber supplementation (35 g/animal/day). Fiber was provided once daily for 120 consecutive days. During the period, semen was collected weekly and analyzed macroscopically and microscopically using the Computer-Assisted Sperm Analysis (CASA) system. Behavior was recorded weekly, one and three hours after feeding, based on a pre-established ethogram. Feed intake, perineal, and fecal scores were also evaluated. Fiber supplementation did not affect total motility, progressive motility, sperm concentration, fecal or perineal scores, or behavior. However, improvements were observed in sperm kinematics, with higher straight-line distance (DSL), linearity (LIN), and straightness (STR), as well as a tendency for increased straight-line velocity (VSL) and wobble (WOB). Conversely, a higher incidence of proximal cytoplasmic droplets was recorded in the fiber group, indicating more sperm maturation defects. Supplemented animals also showed reduced feed intake compared with controls, suggesting a satiety effect of the fiber. In conclusion, PFIF supplementation (35 g/animal/day offered once daily) in adult boars produced mixed outcomes, with improved sperm kinematics but increased maturation defects and only minor changes in feeding behavior, indicating a limited and inconsistent physiological response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.